💡 Not sure what to paste? The example cases below show the kind of detail this tool works best with — facts, evidence, legal issues, lower decision.
๐ Try an Example Case:
Based on 23,167 Federal Court decisions (2001-2026). LightGBM with isotonic calibration and 50 bootstrap-resampled models for confidence intervals.
76% are judicial review applications. Immigration cases make up the largest category.
This tool is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice.
Was this prediction helpful?
Anonymous · no personal info collected
Email me this prediction
We’ll save this prediction to your inbox and, about 5 months from now, send one follow-up email asking how your case turned out. That’s it — two emails total.
Anonymous where possible. We store only your email and the prediction shown. See our privacy policy. Unsubscribe any time with one click from the follow-up email.
For Legal Professionals
Take this prediction further with the NorthLaw professional toolkit:
๐ Strategic Memo Cite-rich brief tailored to your matter
๐ฌ Multi-Tool Analysis Cross-reference predictions across tools
โ๏ธ Opposing Counsel See how the other side could argue
๐ง FC-JR Knowledge Graph 183 judges, case type analytics, trends
Your clients pay for fewer hours of assessment work. You deliver faster results at lower cost — a competitive advantage in winning and retaining clients.
With hours freed up, you have capacity to take on additional cases without hiring — growing revenue from your existing team.
Hours freed/year
0
Extra cases possible
0
Potential extra revenue
$0
Formula: extra cases = hours freed ÷ avg hours/case | assumes each new case bills at avg hours/case × hourly rate
Assumes 1.5 hours saved per case on judicial review outcome assessment. Manual evaluation involves reviewing administrative decisions, reasonableness standards, and procedural fairness issues — this tool delivers a calibrated prediction in under 10 seconds. Tool cost assumes $0.10 per analysis. Average case load of 15 hours used for capacity calculation.